Archive for the ‘semantics’ Category
Feedback on Semantic type assignment.
Mike Kelly: spot and delicious are good - rest is messy. really digging scrumptious.
Caroline Howard: Not much to get inspired by here. All the words hang there without much expression. f*%@ is the only one that stands out, and that one isn’t even that dynamic. This needs more work.
Shane Dobes: You had the biggest contrast of large and small of anyone. Very Bauhaus of you. f&%$ is clever.
Meggan Wood: You have cleverly subtle solutions here (bloodgeon, assuretain). That copy-writing trick is almost an exercise of it’s own. Visually, O boy is strong.
Ben Jackson: Some of these feel slapped together (KKKnowww, Oh Boy, etc. Wait… KKK now?) ascerta!n is elegant!
Hadi Seyfi: With the exception of scrumptious, you overcompensate for the lack of direction with noise and forced arrangements (delicious, fuck, etc.) Less is more, my friend.
Andrea Foster: There are a couple of good ones there - digging the Bludgeon direction. I feel like you went overboard on some of them (fresh, know spot). Overall, more zany, less smart. A few of them have an incorrect font.
Worawan Arnunsiribavorn: You’re not using Futura - which requires you to redo this assignment. There are some clever solutions (O!! Boy) but a few of your arrangements feel arbitrary (scrumpti+++?).
Lauren Jung: Your link wasn’t working - too tired to go dig for it.
Jason Raville: Please break your assignment into individual posts.
